How (Not) to Have the Perfect Church

The final clause in Gal. 5:17 is notoriously difficult.  Paul exhorts his readers in vv. 16-17:

And I say walk by the Spirit and you will not fulfill the desires of the flesh.  For the flesh sets its desire against the Spirit and the Spirit against the flesh, for these are in opposition to one another in order that you may not do the things that you wish (hina mē a ean thelēte tauta poiēte).

Paul’s statement has baffled commentators.  The best suggestion I’ve seen is from John Barclay in his Obeying the Truth.  From what I recall he argues that Paul is saying that the flesh and the Spirit are set in opposition to one another “so that you can’t just do whatever you please.”

I’ve been re-reading Galatians lately, however, and am wondering if perhaps Paul is elucidating something along the following lines.  I may be reading some church experience back into the letter, but there are some contextual factors that point in this direction.

There are competing factions in the Galatian churches arguing about how these communities ought to embody their discipleship to Jesus.  They have been taught by Paul that they are followers of the one true God by their faithfulness to Jesus.  But some are endorsing their conversion to Judaism, which has caused no small disturbance.

There are competing visions over how to be the church, and that’s an essential part of the problem.  In the heat of debate and sharp disagreement over theological articulation and ecclesial practice, positions have hardened and highly-charged accusations are flying back and forth.  The fighting has grown intense because everyone perceives that much is at stake.

Each side is convinced that if their vision carries the day, God’s eschatological blessing will reside on these fledgling communities.

According to Paul, they’re both wrong.

The larger context of vv. 16-17 is all about fostering communities of unity by the power of the Spirit.  No matter their position, anyone agitating forcefully and divisively for one vision and against another is advancing the cause of the flesh.  The flesh is in opposition to the Spirit, so it is impossible to bring about Spirit-oriented ends through fleshly means.

I think that’s the force of Paul’s words: These two realms and these powers are at odds, so if you try to foster eschatological blessing through the means of the flesh (power-grabbing, factional competition, division and judgment of others, etc.), “you’ll never bring about the ends that you’re desiring” (v. 17b).  You’ll never acheive the sort of church you want through factionalism and the promotion of this side over that side.  Using those means only promotes the cause of “the flesh,” which is discouragement, division, and a broken-down community.

They all need to get in step with the Spirit, who is present among them and is empowering them to foster love, peace, unity, reconciliation, forgiveness, deference.

How to get the perfect church?  Give up the quest for it, stop fighting, warmly receive one another as God’s good gifts, and pursue faithfulness working itself out in love.

About these ads

4 responses to “How (Not) to Have the Perfect Church

  • bobmacdonald

    On Sunday, I mentioned in conversation to my preacher, after a somewhat triumphalist sermon, the desire to be able to read with one ear both Torah and Christ. He said that I might need to see the disjunction between them. One God? with a disjunction?

    I think on reading your note that the Galatians have this problem and that we needn’t blame Chalcedon for the Shoa, since the disjunction between Jew and Gentile predates it by some distance. Yet the Christian is to learn from TNK as does the Jew, and not be as Marcion advised. One God – against the ‘flesh’. Who wins?

    This morning I was finally educating myself on Rhetorical criticism – reading Phillis Trible on Jonah – a delightful history of the analysis of rhetoric from the year dot to the late 20th c. (I don’t know yet if I will agree with her analysis of Jonah but I know she will be clear). We are so good at taxonomy but we are not able to warmly receive each other. Do we only spend our lives reading ‘about’ the text?

    • timgombis

      I think Paul draws out at greater length these very points in Romans–that Jew and non-Jew in Christ must listen to Torah with a posture of humility so that it fosters a community of pistis (faithfulness). The problem is that two groups in Rome (Christian Jew and non-Jewish Christians) are using Torah to denounce each other and establish dominance over the other. A sure recipe for communal disaster!

  • thebareden

    This is a good word. I value this blog more every day, bro.

    ::M::

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 257 other followers

%d bloggers like this: