Paul’s Politics of Exile

Sarah and I enjoyed a fun weekend at the Wheaton Theology Conference.  The excellent presentations left us with much to reflect upon and we were happy to catch up with some good friends.

In my paper, I argued that a narrative approach helpfully illuminates Romans 13:1-7.  Paul’s instruction here has the same basic shape as Jeremiah’s instruction to the exiles in Jeremiah 29. The exiles in Jeremiah’s day needed to grapple with their identity as the people of God in an unfamiliar situation, embracing the role of a vulnerable community in a threatening and hostile environment.  Paul’s exhortations to the Roman church are in continuity with Jeremiah’s instruction to the exiles.

Jeremiah’s and Paul’s instruction have the same direction and intention.  Jeremiah’s exhortation to seek the peace of Babylon is intended to shape the character and outlook of the exiled community as it considers how to make a way forward.  It is not an endorsement of the goodness of the Babylonian empire or the rightness of its actions.  If the prophet intended to speak of the Babylonian empire in itself, he would reflect prophetic critiques found elsewhere, referring to beasts with voracious appetites heading for destruction.

In the same way, Paul’s instruction to the Roman church is intended to shape its character and outlook as it considers its future.  Paul is not validating Rome’s conduct in any way, affirming neither the empire’s goodness nor the rightness of its actions.  If he were to speak of the character of the empire in itself, he would likely take up the prophetic critique (as John does in Revelation) and make reference to beasts that devour and are headed for destruction.

Two fairly huge implications flow from this.

First, when American Christians theologize about the modern secular state, they must remember that Romans 13:1-7 is only part of a larger biblical vision.  Christians who start with Romans 13 will typically end up with an inappropriately positive conception of the state, a vision in which the church ought to be supportive of the government and its policies, and being a good Christian means being patriotic.

Second, I think that contemporary evangelicals—especially those who imagine America is or ever was a “Christian nation”—should give sustained attention to the character of God’s people in exile.

This notion has received little attention in evangelical discussions of politics.  I suspect that’s because it runs counter to desires to influence policy, control the levers of power, and determine the course of national history.

I concluded my paper with this paragraph:

American evangelicals would do well to consider how Israel’s exile shaped Paul’s conception of the church—his vision of a weak and vulnerable wandering people among the nations.  We feel that we’re losing power, influence, access, our former position of political leverage and cultural dominance.  We grow worrisome, anxious, nervous about the sort of future our churches will face and the conditions our children will encounter.  I’ll just suggest to you that this might be a strategic moment for us to embrace our identity as God’s wandering people among the nations.  It just may be that this emerging moment of cultural weakness is God’s gift to his church.  What if it’s an opportunity for the God revealed in the crucified Jesus to press his people into the shape of the cross?  What if the Lord of the church is grieved when we strive for power and agitate to control the course of history?  Do we risk being blind to Paul’s vision for the polis of Jesus because we’re overcome by cultural resentment fueled by memories of former days when our opinions held sway?

10 thoughts on “Paul’s Politics of Exile

  1. Andrew T.

    Paul’s exhortations to the Roman church are in continuity with Jeremiah’s instruction to the exiles.

    Could it be because Paul was addressing the same group Jeremiah addressed? There seems to be an unfounded assumption here that although they shared the same message, and addressed the same concern, they addressed a different group.

    If true, Paul’s use of OT scripture is somewhat deceitful, taking Jeremiah’s words out of context, applying to a completely different scenario, committing a fallacy of modal logic (what was true of Jeremiah’s context isn’t necessarily true of Paul’s).

    On the otherhand, if Jeremiah and Paul were addressing the same group, addressing the same circumstance, albeit fast-forwarded in time (in accordance with prophecy), Paul’s relationship to Jeremiah and indeed the use of his words, would be much more honest, much more relevant, and much more evident of Godly inspiration.

    The question is ultimately whether or not Paul’s use of scripture was in fulfilment of the purpose of scripture, or merely a handy rhetorical tool he used to adress situations and groups that had the veneer of being similar. For the sake of his credibility, I hope it was the former.

  2. Andrew T.

    I would also suggest that Daniels beasts were four, and fulfilled a very specific role to Israel in fulfillment of the Abrahamic (and so Mosaic) covenant, as signposts in history to the Messianic age and the restoration of the Kingdom of God. (So also with Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and John)

    So American Evangelicals who fail to recognize this are really only showing much of the OT, and OT prophecy is veiled to them. The last (of 4 beasts) beast fell once and finally when it tried to consume the child (the saviour) whose mother (also the Kingdom) then fled into the wilderness where it grew into a great mountain.

    1. timgombis

      I do agree that it is more helpful to develop a biblical theology of nations from the entire scope of Israel’s Scriptures rather than from isolated statements in NT texts.

  3. John Duffy

    I totally agree. Governments are a reflection of our fallen world. They are needed as a result of our sinfulness and are sinful themselves.

  4. Pingback: Tim Gombis on American politics and evangelicals | Imagine with Scripture

  5. Pingback: Something to ponder at the upcoming Australian Federal Election | Imagine with Scripture

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s