God Has No Favorites

Paul wrote Romans 1:18-3:20 to the Roman church with a pastoral intention.  He’s not necessarily laying the groundwork for a gospel presentation here, nor is he speaking of the sinful condition of all humanity.  It isn’t wrong, of course, to theologize from Rom. 1-3 about universal human sinfulness, but we must keep in mind that Paul’s initial point here is that God does not have any favorites in the Roman community.  No one has an inside track with God.

This section begins with Paul’s statement that God’s wrath is being revealed against “all ungodliness and unrighteousness.”  While Paul paints in broad strokes in vv. 18-32, he arrives at his point in Rom. 2:1.  Neither group in Rome should be passing judgment on the other.

In Rom. 2:1-13, Paul depicts the final judgment in terms of conformity to God’s design for humanity rather than obedience to the Law.  He does this to demonstrate that everyone—both Jews and non-Jews among the Roman Christians—is subject to the same judgment.  Being part of the historic people of God shaped by the Law is irrelevant at the final judgment.  What matters is participating in God’s rectification program in which he is restoring humanity.  If a person participates in this, she will participate in the coming restored order, whether she is Jewish or non-Jewish.  If she does not participate in this but remains a selfish, disobedient person, she will be judged, whether she is Jewish or non-Jewish.

Paul again states his point: “for there is no partiality with God” (v. 11).  God does not have favorites among the Roman Christians.

Rom. 2:6-13, by the way, has given fits to interpreters in the Reformed tradition because Paul puts final judgment in terms of human action and states plainly that “the doers of the Law will be justified” (v. 13).  James, of course, wouldn’t lift an eyebrow, nor would those who rightly understand Paul.  Many, however, do everything they can to avoid reading Paul’s words plainly.  As I’ve said previously (here, here, and here), Paul is not reflecting timelessly or abstractly on a theology of justification.  He’s writing a pastoral letter to a multi-ethnic church in Rome that is facing communal breakdown because of racial tension.

In v. 13, Paul distinguishes those who are Jewish from “the doers of the Law.”  They are not coterminous.  It is one thing to be “of the works of the Law” or “a hearer of the Law” (to be ethnically Jewish), and quite another to be a “doer of the Law” (one whose genuine obedience is embodied by embracing non-Jewish Christians as equal siblings in God’s new family in Christ).

The gentiles Paul has in mind in Rom. 2:14-17 are not random morally upright non-Christians wherever they may be found throughout history.  They are the non-Jewish Christians in Rome.  While they do not have a historic relationship to the Law of Moses, their obedience to God in Christ is reckoned as just that.  It is the work of the Law within them even though they do not have a Jewish mode of life (i.e., they are not “of the works of the Law”).

In Rom. 2:17-29, Paul again makes the point that being Jewish does not give one an inside track with God.  The Jews in the Roman church, in fact, are just like the non-Jews in that they are part of a people with a long history of sin. 

After all this negative talk about the Jews in Rome, Paul does let up a little in 3:1.  They are indeed in a position of advantage since they were entrusted with the Scriptures.  But does this mean that the Jews are better than the non-Jews in Rome (v. 9)?  Do they have cause for boasting? 

“Not at all,” states Paul.  “We have already charged that both Jews and Greeks are all under sin” (v. 9), and the Law closes “every mouth” and makes “all the world” accountable to God (v. 19).  This explains Paul’s statement in Rom. 3:20 that “by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified in his sight.”  Paul is not ruling out legalism here (though he would if called upon to do so), but summarizing his argument that being Jewish doesn’t give a person the inside track with God.

God does not have favorites among the Roman Christians.  Both groups—the Jews and non-Jews—are accountable to God and will be judged if they are disobedient.  God’s future judgment is on the basis of obedience to Jesus and one’s ethnicity will be irrelevant on that day.  This is Paul’s point in Rom. 1:18-3:20.  Reading Romans a pastoral letter rather than as a theological treatise makes this plain.

I might also add that when read this way, Rom. 1:18-3:20 becomes immensely practical for churches dealing with internal tensions, conflict, or any other communal breakdown.  Romans, rightly read, is a rich resource for conflict-resolution.

10 thoughts on “God Has No Favorites

  1. bobmacdonald

    Do you know if there are Greek or Latin examples outside of Scripture that handle repetition the way Paul does in Romans? E.g. 1:18-32, them, they, etc 23 times, chapter 2:1-5 you, etc 15 times, 6-16 every/they, 17-29, you 25 times, then skipping to chapter 5:1-11 second person plural 26 times and so on, 6, you plural, 7 I, first person singular etc. He is quite definitive in his rhetoric.

  2. athanasius96

    I like this series about Romans. This book often becomes the entry point and excuse to treat the whole Bible abstractly. A more concrete, pastoral view here can make a difference in the whole of Biblical interpretation and theology.

    1. timgombis

      Romans remained a mystery to me when it was taught as Paul’s late-career reflective abstract theology. But it’s nothing of the sort! Since reading it seriously as a pastoral letter meant to help an actual church (or group of churches) resolve relational conflicts, it’s made so much more sense to me.

  3. Sean LeRoy (@seantleroy)

    Great series on Romans.Question – do you think that Romans puts Gentiles under the law in typically Reformed way of understanding, i.e. a law/gospel contrast? I personally don’t think so, but I’ve struggled with 3:19 “the whole world held accountable”, which would presumably be as a result of the law (or breaking thereof) and presumably include the Gentiles…No attempt here at a loaded question, but just seeking some help on reading that text in particular.

    1. timgombis

      Thanks, Sean! No, I don’t think the typical Reformed of Lutheran law/gospel contrast faithfully reflects Paul’s theology. And I don’t think that Paul sees gentiles as being accountable to the Law necessarily, either. In 3:19, Paul’s saying that the Law speaks to those under the Law — Jews — so that they also are accountable to God and subject to his judgment. The emphasis is on the Law speaking to them. While some Lutheran and Reformed understandings of the Law are nicely nuanced, I think too much Western theology and soteriology has been read back into the Law so that a genuine biblical understanding has been distorted. Because of this, of course, Paul is then distorted.

  4. S Wu

    Hi Tim, I wonder whether you have any thoughts on Doug Campbell’s massive Deliverance of God (2009)? I haven’t read the whole book yet. But with the little that I’ve read I do find him refreshing – ie. I tend to think that Rom 5-8 has much to say about Paul’s theology. It seems that, according to the reviews I have browsed, the “Teacher” in the early chapters of Romans that Campbell identifies in his book is somewhat confusing.

    1. timgombis

      I’ve dipped into it here and there, but haven’t worked through his proposal on Romans. I agree with his overall reading of Paul, however, broadly speaking–the apocalyptic perspective of salvation as the in-breaking of God to free an enslaved cosmos. I don’t think you need the adventurous proposal regarding “the Teacher” in order to get there.

  5. Daniel

    I think that the allusion to Jeremiah 31 in Romans 2:15 strengthens your argument.

    Why would Paul say that the work of the law is written on heart of an unbeliever? It’s more probable that this is a reference to Gentile Christians who have experienced the reality of spiritual circumcision (Rom. 2:28-29).

  6. Pingback: Tim Gombis: Divine Election « Jeff Figearo's Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s